Hillary Comments On Bill Recently Passed By The House

0
700

Ah, Hillary Clinton—still clinging to the spotlight like it’s 2016 and America is just dying to hear what she thinks about… well, anything. On Thursday, the former First Lady, former senator, former Secretary of State, and perpetual political flameout popped up to sound the alarm on what she’s calling a voter suppression plot. The crime? Republicans dared to pass a bill that says, brace yourself, you should prove you’re a citizen before voting in U.S. elections. Groundbreaking stuff, right?

But according to Clinton, the GOP’s Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act is a direct threat to “millions” of women—specifically, 69 million women whose married names supposedly don’t match their birth certificates. And just like that, she declared the entire female electorate to be victims of patriarchal voter suppression. Because of course she did.

Let’s take a moment to appreciate the mental gymnastics here. The SAVE Act simply asks for what should be the bare minimum in any functioning democracy: proof that you’re legally allowed to vote. That’s it. Not ten forms of ID. Not a DNA test. Just a document showing that you are a U.S. citizen. But leave it to Hillary to turn that into a war on women. Honestly, if Hillary Clinton put half as much effort into protecting national security as she does twisting legislation into a feminist sob story, we might not have had that little private server fiasco.

And she wasn’t alone in this latest meltdown. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joined the chorus with her own spin, claiming the SAVE Act would “disenfranchise 70 million married American women.” You’d think these folks have never updated a driver’s license before. Apparently, in their version of America, every DMV visit ends in tragedy and voter registration is some sort of Indiana Jones-style quest for lost documents.

Luckily, Republicans weren’t having it. Rep. Kat Cammack nailed it with a simple yet devastating reply: “Stop. You are lying. Read the bill. And for the love of God, stop treating women like they are incapable or idiots.” That about sums it up. Because what Clinton and company are really doing isn’t empowering women—it’s insulting them. The entire premise rests on the idea that women are too confused, disorganized, or helpless to manage a name change on a legal document. That’s not advocacy. That’s condescension wrapped in identity politics.

Senator Mike Lee also jumped in to point out the obvious: if this kind of documentation were really that insurmountable, those same women wouldn’t be able to get jobs either. After all, I-9 forms require the exact same proof of citizenship. So unless Clinton is also suggesting we cancel employment verification nationwide, her logic doesn’t just fall apart—it vaporizes on contact with common sense.

And let’s not forget Rep. Chip Roy, the guy who actually introduced the bill, who put it plainly: “Just show an ID. Why would you not want to verify citizenship?” That’s the question Democrats still can’t answer. Instead of engaging in real debate, they default to scare tactics and emotional manipulation. Meanwhile, the bill specifically includes provisions for resolving discrepancies like name changes, and allows for multiple forms of valid government-issued ID. So, no, married women are not about to be turned away en masse at polling places. Unless, of course, they’re non-citizens—then yes, that’s sort of the point.

It’s the same tired playbook from the Left: accuse, exaggerate, and deflect. Because heaven forbid Americans start thinking voter integrity matters again. Democrats have spent years pretending voter fraud doesn’t exist, all while fighting tooth and nail against any measure to secure the system. The SAVE Act is common sense, but to the Hillary wing of the Democratic Party, common sense is public enemy number one.

So, once again, the American people are stuck watching the Democratic Party scream about problems that don’t exist, hoping no one notices the facts. But this time, the facts are crystal clear: being asked to prove you’re a citizen before voting in a federal election isn’t oppression. It’s democracy functioning the way it’s supposed to. And no amount of dramatic Twitter posts from the former Secretary of State is going to change that.